ALCANTARA, MARCELA C.SORDI, GIAN M.A.A.CALDAS, LINDA V.E.FURQUIM, TANIA A.C.2014-11-172014-11-182015-04-022014-11-172014-11-182015-04-02ALCANTARA, MARCELA C.; SORDI, GIAN M.A.A.; CALDAS, LINDA V.E.; FURQUIM, TANIA A.C. Comparison between the implementation of quality criteria of radiographic image in conventional and digital mammography equipments. In: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, 12th, October 19-24, 2008, Buenos Aires, Argentina. <b>Proceedings...</b> Disponível em: http://repositorio.ipen.br/handle/123456789/15918.http://repositorio.ipen.br/handle/123456789/15918The mammographic examination needs a strict quality control. A publication of the European Commission provides guidelines on quality criteria for the images of the breast, quantifying the quality obtained in the image. Following the recommendations of the European Commission, two kinds of mammographic equipments, at a same institution, were evaluated to compare the quality of the conventional and digital images. Besides of that, the Average Glandular Dose (AGD) and the Entrance Surface Dose (ESD) were measured by using an ionization chamber (Radcal, 6M) in the radiation beams of each equipment. The digital equipment fulfills more quality criteria than the conventional equipment, provided ESD values, AGD values and a rejection index lower than the conventional equipment. Therefore, the digital mammography can be considered more adequate than the conventional one, both for criteria analyses and for dose optimization.openAccessbiomedical radiographyeuropean unionimplementationionization chambersmammary glandsoptimizationquality controlradiation dosesrecommendationsTexto completo de eventohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7362-2455