ALINE ARAUJO PERINI
4 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
Tese IPEN-doc 28491 Mapa de competência tecnológica e capacidade inovativa por modelagem DEA e análise tripla-hélice2021 - PERINI, ALINE A.Foi mapeado o ecossistema de inovação tecnológica do IPEN/CNEN-SP. Propósito e Importância: a gestão por meio das melhores práticas de inovação tem se tornado cada vez mais importante para satisfazer os quesitos da transformação entre passado, presente e futuro. Metodologia: por meio de pesquisa multifacetada, os recortes nortearam determinantes para alavancar o sucesso da inovação com maior potencial nas rotas de comercialização tecnológica. Integrou-se recortes sobre a qualidade de indicadores de inovação, fragmentos da pesquisa de campo, compilação de sistemas gerenciais e edição de prêmios de inovação. Classificou-se as entradas e as saídas do ecossistema de inovação para análise conjunta DEA tripla-hélice. Resultados: foi revelada uma relação intrínseca de codependência das variáveis de estudo. A caracterização proposta de entradas e saídas apresentou índice de correlação de R=96%, maior do que simplificação temporal de R=91%. A perspectiva dos servidores foi crítica, porém positiva ao associar a marca atrelada à inovação. A análise DEA tripla-hélice anunciou a expressão predominante e de maior alcance com a indústria. Entretanto, o grupo de centros de pesquisa que possuem relação predominantemente com o governo, apresentaram a eficiência sensivelmente mais alta. Originalidade: promove informação para identificar incertezas e diminuir riscos inerentes à gestão da inovação.Artigo IPEN-doc 25528 Matching technological bid in smart cities initiatives2018 - PERINI, ALINE A.; SHIRAISHI, GUILHERME F.; FREITAS, ANDERSON Z.The main objective of this work was to present a general framework of the technology roadmap from a central competence of Nuclear and Energy Research Institute from Brazil. The approach provides a structured to strength the join to market mechanism design to survive in complex environment trends to shape the future. The technological innovation impact measures depend from (1) quality of diversified technology knowledge and (2) quality of diversified country industry knowledge. From this big view picture, the Technology Transfer Office took these two general dimensions of impact into account and divided them into four (4) sub-categories that explain potential benefits and performance results in areas such as: a) Current Projects and Programs, b) Patents, c) Education and Teaching and d) Scientific Publications. The sampling contemplated the big picture of performance related in National Management Information System and a repository proper in response to institutional performance growth and plans, programs and projects associated in Innovation key indicators and policy disclosure. The taxonomy to road mapping innovation impact measure was centered in terms in two potential fields to shape the future: i) Nuclear Research Reactors and/or ii) Nanotechnology.Resumo IPEN-doc 24840 Innovation trajectories2017 - PERINI, ALINE A.; FREITAS, ANDERSON Z.The main objective of this work is to present general framework of the impact of technological innovation in the IPEN´s nanotechnology competence. The innovation are vital to improvement offer through chains front-to-end in health, environment, food and agriculture, energy, chemistry, education, entertainment and arts: treat supranational levels, offers accessible global technology. The pool innovation perspective in IPEN´s nanotechnology competence is a natural consequence of investments in Research and Development (R&D), between and among Universities and Public Research Institutions and multiple benefits arising from results, towards Awards in Science and policy disclosure. Geographically IPEN is held at São Paulo, Capital, one of the 10 biggest cities of the globe with high density on population and market demand. The innovation impact measures depend of (1) quality of diversified technology knowledge and (2) quality of diversified country industry knowledge that can be more specified. From this big view picture, the IPEN Technology Transference Office took account both dimensional innovation impact measures and listed detail in four (4) dimensional approach performance indicators over 5 years casting potential benefits outcomes in areas: a) human resource, b) services and products, c) research, teach and educational, d) intellectuals property, patents, projects, creativity and inventiveness. Regarding on Key Innovation Indicators and Policy of Impact Measures, the methodology applied to the present study consists oh the three main stages. First stage is a review with bibliometric analysis of market dynamics and technological management approach. The second stage was characterized by the data collection on management system from IPEN in labeled activities on nanotechnology. The third stage was marked to the understanding of the structure and the dynamics of nanotechnology markets, especially their sometimes acute response in innovation. The case study in IPEN´s in nanotechnology market built a preliminary assessment from a suitable a roadmapping system. Roodmapping is one of the most widely used tools as predictive exercise, supporting systematic planning and standardized strategy development. Many countries have developed standardization of roadmaps in various areas reported in intelligent systems, identifying significant opportunities and challenges associated with standardization in complex areas. IPEN´s nanotechnology competence in numbers is an inspirational approach engine and large influence in cultural and Institutional policymaking in Science, Technology and Innovation (S&T&I). The unique strengthen link can be matched from the S&T&I policy in term "technology transfer” in capacity building from push or/and pull innovation models. The central competence framework aimed at advancing knowledge necessary that would eventually lead to innovation trajectories and with strong security cultural insertion gauge to country succeed in international competition through innovation and growth, high-quality products and services, and research and education. Strategic differentiation could lead disruption in technology and development of new markets. The solutions by market-driven provide improvement at total quality managing front-to-end of technology transfer.Resumo IPEN-doc 24617 Innovation trajectories, insertion areas, a roadmap IEA-R1 in numbers2017 - PERINI, A.A.; FREITAS, A.Z.The main objective of this work is to present a general framework of the impact of technological innovation in the Research Reactor IEA-R1. The innovation are vital to improvement offer through chains front-to-end in health, environment, food and agriculture, energy, chemistry, education, entertainment and arts: treat supranational levels and offers accessible global technology. The innovation pool perspective in IEA-R1 is a natural consequence of investments in Research and Development (R&D), between and among Universities and Public Research Institutions and multiple benefits arising from results, towards Awards in Science and Policy disclosure. Geographically IEA-R1 is situated in São Paulo Capital, one of the 10 biggest cities of the globe with high density of population and market demand. The technological innovation impact measurements depend on (1) quality of diversified technology knowledge and (2) quality of diversified country industry knowledge, these innovation indicators can be specified further. From this big view picture, IPEN’s Technology Transfer Office took these two general dimensions of impact into account and divided them into four (4) sub-categories that explain over five years of the potential benefits and performance results in areas such as: a) human resources, b) services and products, c) research, teaching and education, d) intellectual property, patents, projects, creativity and inventiveness. IEA-R1 research reactor in numbers is an inspirational approach engine and large influence in cultural and Institutional policymaking in Science, Technology and Innovation (S&T&I). The unique strengthen link can be matched from the S&T&I Policy in term of "technology transfer" in capacity building from push or/and pull innovation models. The central competence framework aimed at advancing knowledge necessary for initiating a Brazilian Multipurpose Reactor (RMB) installation process that would eventually lead to innovation trajectories and with strong security and safe cultural insertion gauge to country succeed in international competition through innovation and growth, high-quality products and services, and research and education areas.