CARLA DARUICH DE SOUZA

(Fonte: Lattes)
ORCID
ScopusID
ResearcherID
Google Scholar
Resumo

Bsc in Medical Physics from UNESP in Botucatu Compleated at IPEN, University of São Paulo: 1) Master's Degree: Comparison between methods for fixing iodine-125 on silver substrate for fabricating sources used in Brachytherapy / 2) PhD: Parameters for production of iodine-125 sources used in brachytherapy and "sandwich" doctorate: Washington State University - training in radiochemistry and organic chemistry / 3) Post doctorate: Production of nanosources for the treatment of cancer / 4) Project: Analysis of methods to obtain / produce nuclear material for use in a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG)/ Advisor of the Professional Master's Degree in Radiation Technology in Health / Professor of the Professional Master Program in the disciplines Dosimetry for Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Fundamentals / Professor of the Academic Master Program in the discipline TNA5805 - Brachytherapy: Fundamentals, Production, Application, Dosimetry and Quality Research Associate of KAERI - Korean Atomic Energy and Research Institute (Text obtained from the Currículo Lattes on October 6th 2021)


Formada em Física Médica pela UNESP em Botucatu Realizado no IPEN-USP/ SP: 1) Mestrado: Comparação entre métodos de fixação do iodo-125 em substrato de prata para confecção de fontes utilizadas em Braquiterapia / 2) Doutorado: Parâmetros para produção de confecção de fontes de iodo-125 utilizadas em Braquiterapia e Doutorado sanduíche: Washington State University - treinamento em radioquímica / 3) Pós doutorado: Produção de nanofontes para tratamento de câncer / 4) Projeto: Análise de formas de obtenção/produção do material nuclear para utilização em um gerador termoelétrico radioisotópico (RTG)/ Orientadora do Mestrado Profissional de Tecnologia das Radiações na Saúde/ Professora do Mestrado Profissional nas disciplinas Dosimetria para Radioterapia e Fundamentos de Radioterapia/ Professora do Mestrado Acadêmico na disciplina TNA5805 - Braquiterapia: Fundamentos, Produção, Aplicação, Dosimetria e Qualidade Research Associate do KAERI - Korean Atomic Energy and Research Institute (Texto extraído do Currículo Lattes em 06 out. 2021)

Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Cargo

Filtros

20171
Limpar filtros

Configurações

Autor: ANDERSON SORGATTI DE SOUZA × Tipo de acesso: closedAccess ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Resumo IPEN-doc 26912
    Methodology for in vivo dosimetry using TLD-100 for radiotherapic treatment
    2017 - RODRIGUES, B.T.; SOUZA, P.D. de; SOUZA, C.D. de; ROSTELATO, M.C.M.; ZEITUNI, C.; NOGUEIRA, B.R.; MARQUES, J. de O.; SOUZA, A.S. de
    Cancer is a public health problem that affects approximately 27 million people worldwide. The most common type in Brazil among men is prostate cancer with 61 thousand cases. There are two forms of radiotherapy treatments that can be used: teletherapy and brachytherapy. Before starting the teletherapy treatment, a planning is done that makes the acquisition of the anatomical information of the patient to then classify the areas of interest. Dosimetry is performed as a quality control to ensure that the calculated dose is equal to that received by the patient. In vivo dosimetry acts as an independent measurement and this work aims at comparing the dosimetry performed using thermoluminescent dosimeters (LiF: Mg, Ti - TLD - 100) with dose values calculated in the planning system (TPS). Methods: All dosimeters were prepared to be used in an anthropomorphic phantom. A selection of dosimeters, 50 micro TLD’s, selected after heat treatment, were then irradiated and a reading was made. A case planned by TPS was selected and compared the dosimetry performed in an anthropomorphic phantom for the same case. Results: All values obtained were within the deviation ( 5%) allowed by the protocol. The results of this work will help to implement a new quality program in the Radiotherapy Service at Hospital das Cl ınicas de S~ao Paulo. Conclusion: The accurate dosimeter selection provided a feasible and reliable evaluation that enabled the comparison.