FERNANDA MARTINS QUEIROZ
4 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
Artigo IPEN-doc 23987 On the effects of hydrothermal treatments on the corrosion resistance of the TSA anodized AA7475-T761 alloy2016 - ALMEIDA, THALLIS L.; QUEIROZ, FERNANDA M.; TERADA, MAYSA; COSTA, ISOLDA; CAPELOSSI, VERA R.The effect of hydrothermal treatment time on sealing and corrosion resistance of the AA7475-T761 anodized aluminium alloy has been investigated in this study. The hydrothermal treatments tested are environmental compatible without chromium ions involved. Anodizing was carried out by a tartaric-sulphuric anodizing (TSA) process and this was followed by hydrothermal treatments for partial sealing, in various solutions. The effect of propyleneglycol (PRG) and/or cerium ions in the hydrothermal treatment solution was evaluated. Four treatment times were tested, specifically, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 min. The corrosion resistance of the anodized and treated samples was evaluated by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) and the anodic layers formed were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The EIS results showed that the hydrothermal treatments in solutions with cerium ions resulted in similar impedances for periods of treatment from 5 to 10 min whereas in the solutions with PRG the impedance increased with time of treatment from 2.5 to 10 min showing a slower kinetics of anodic layer sealing. However, the fastest kinetics of sealing were associated to the treatments that combined two steps, one in PRG and other in cerium containing solutions with similar impedances obtained from 2.5 to 10 min of treatment. Surface evaluation by SEM showed that the porosities in the anodic layer were not sealed for the periods of hydrothermal treatments corresponding to 2.5 min. The presence of cerium in hydrothermal treatment had a beneficial effect on the stability of the anodic layer formed and provided a healing effect on the corroding sites.Artigo IPEN-doc 23560 EIS behavior of anodized and primer coated AA2198–T851 compared to AA2024–T3 exposed to salt spray CASS test2016 - QUEIROZ, F.M.; BUGARIN, A.F.S.; HAMMEL, N.P.; CAPELOSSI, V.R.; TERADA, M.; COSTA, I.In this investigation, the corrosion behavior of AA2198–T851 was compared to AA2024–T3 by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and the surface of both alloys was analyzed by Field Emission Gun (FEG) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Xray energy dispersive analysis (EDX). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results for the uncoated surface of both alloys showed higher pitting susceptibility associated to the AA2198–T851 alloy comparatively to the AA2024–T3. In order to improve the corrosion resistance of both alloys, tartaric sulphuric acid anodising (TSA) was carried out with both alloys followed by primer application. The corrosion resistance of the anodized and primer coated samples was also evaluated by CASS salt spray test followed by EIS tests at increasing periods of exposure to the CASS test. The results showed larger amounts of corrosion products associated to the primer coated AA2198–T851 alloy comparatively to the AA2024–T3 alloy. Diffusionwas only indicated in the EIS results of the AA2198–T851 samples likely because of large amounts of porous corrosion products on the exposed surface of this alloy to the corrosive environment.Artigo IPEN-doc 14480 Investigation of the corrosion behaviour of AA 2024-T3 in low concentrated chloride media2008 - QUEIROZ, F.M.; MAGNANI, M.; COSTA, I.; MELO, H.G. deArtigo IPEN-doc 19108 Electrochemical behaviour of electrogalvanized steel with a conversion treatment at room temperature2012 - TOMACHUK, C.R.; QUEIROZ, F.M.; COSTA, I.