Comparison between RELAP5 versions for a two-phase natural circulation analysis
| dc.contributor.author | BRAZ FILHO, FRANCISCO A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | RIBEIRO, GUILHERME B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | SABUNDJIAN, GAIANE | |
| dc.contributor.author | CALDEIRA, ALEXANDRE D. | |
| dc.coverage | Internacional | pt_BR |
| dc.creator.evento | INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR ATLANTIC CONFERENCE | pt_BR |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-02T11:42:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-01-02T11:42:04Z | |
| dc.date.evento | October 22-27, 2017 | pt_BR |
| dc.description.abstract | RELAP5 is one of the most used numerical tools to predict thermal-hydraulic and neutronic phenomena in nuclear reactors. RELAP5-3D is the latest version of this software family, but RELAP5-mod3 is still widely used in Brazilian research institutes and it is also used as benchmark for several nuclear applications. Among these applications, the use of passive heat transfer mechanisms, such as natural circulation, has drawn attention of several studies, especially after the Fukushima-Daiichi accident. Considering this aforementioned aspect, this study proposes a comparison of RELAP5-3D and RELAP5-mod3 versions, focusing on a two-phase natural circulation loop. For comparison purposes, an experimental data set is part of the analysis. Results showed that during the single-phase regime, the temperature difference between versions is negligible. However, when the two-phase flow regime takes place, different wavelengths and amplitudes of flow instabilities were obtained for each version. When compared to the experimental data set, the RELAP5-3D version provided the best prediction results. | pt_BR |
| dc.event.sigla | INAC | pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.citation | BRAZ FILHO, FRANCISCO A.; RIBEIRO, GUILHERME B.; SABUNDJIAN, GAIANE; CALDEIRA, ALEXANDRE D. Comparison between RELAP5 versions for a two-phase natural circulation analysis. In: INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR ATLANTIC CONFERENCE, October 22-27, 2017, Belo Horizonte, MG. <b>Proceedings...</b> Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Associação Brasileira de Energia Nuclear, 2017. Disponível em: http://repositorio.ipen.br/handle/123456789/28178. | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9544-4509 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ipen.br/handle/123456789/28178 | |
| dc.local | Rio de Janeiro, RJ | pt_BR |
| dc.local.evento | Belo Horizonte, MG | pt_BR |
| dc.publisher | Associação Brasileira de Energia Nuclear | pt_BR |
| dc.rights | openAccess | pt_BR |
| dc.subject | comparative evaluations | |
| dc.subject | computerized simulation | |
| dc.subject | differential equations | |
| dc.subject | natural convection | |
| dc.subject | r codes | |
| dc.subject | thermal hydraulics | |
| dc.subject | two-phase flow | |
| dc.title | Comparison between RELAP5 versions for a two-phase natural circulation analysis | pt_BR |
| dc.type | Texto completo de evento | pt_BR |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| ipen.autor | GAIANE SABUNDJIAN | |
| ipen.codigoautor | 202 | |
| ipen.contributor.ipenauthor | GAIANE SABUNDJIAN | |
| ipen.date.recebimento | 18-01 | pt_BR |
| ipen.event.datapadronizada | 2017 | pt_BR |
| ipen.identifier.ipendoc | 24003 | pt_BR |
| ipen.notas.internas | Proceedings | pt_BR |
| ipen.type.genre | Artigo | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 915b9343-9eaf-4b03-b709-85699f77b71c | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 915b9343-9eaf-4b03-b709-85699f77b71c | |
| sigepi.autor.atividade | SABUNDJIAN, GAIANE:202:420:N | pt_BR |