Density comparison of 3D printing materials and the human body

dc.contributor.authorSAVI, M.
dc.contributor.authorPOTIENS, M.P.A.
dc.contributor.authorSILVEIRA, L.C.
dc.contributor.authorCECHINEL, C.M.
dc.contributor.authorSOARES, F.A.P.
dc.coverageInternacionalpt_BR
dc.creator.eventoINTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE RADIO 2017pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-27T11:39:43Z
dc.date.available2018-02-27T11:39:43Z
dc.date.eventoSeptember 24-29, 2017pt_BR
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Phantoms are commonly used for teaching and radiation dosimetry as a simulator of the human body in order that no individual be exposed to radiation during training and research. Some are the properties that can be used as a measurement parameter in a phantom: density, energy compatibility, attenuation and scattering of the radiation, anthropomorphism, among others. 3D printing has revolutionized many areas of knowledge, including those that make use of radiations. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the density of various materials applied in 3D printing and compare found values with human body density in ICRP 110. Methods: Cubes with 2cm edges were printed on 12materials of different compositions with internal filling of 60 %, 80% and 100%, weighed on a precision balance and measured with a caliper. Results: The densities found ranged from 0,575 g/cm³ to 2,624 g/cm³ for 60% infill, 0,686 g/cm³ to 3,091 g/cm³ for 80% and 0,794 g/cm³ to 3,572 g/cm³ for 100%. Densities related to teeth, bones, muscles, fat, among others, could be created from specific infill variations. Conclusion: All analyzed materials have the capacity to mimic the structures described in ICRP 110 when the percentage of filling are varied. However, even achieving human tissue density the materials may be not adequate for attenuation and require further experiments.pt_BR
dc.event.siglaSBPRpt_BR
dc.format.extent1-3pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationSAVI, M.; POTIENS, M.P.A.; SILVEIRA, L.C.; CECHINEL, C.M.; SOARES, F.A.P. Density comparison of 3D printing materials and the human body. In: INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE RADIO 2017, September 24-29, 2017, Goiânia, GO. <b>Proceedings...</b> Maringá, PR: Sociedade Brasileira de Proteção Radiológica, 2017. p. 1-3. Disponível em: http://repositorio.ipen.br/handle/123456789/28585.
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4049-6720
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ipen.br/handle/123456789/28585
dc.localMaringá, PRpt_BR
dc.local.eventoGoiânia, GOpt_BR
dc.publisherSociedade Brasileira de Proteção Radiológicapt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectdensity
dc.subjectmaterials
dc.subjectthree-dimensional calculations
dc.subjectphantoms
dc.subjectanimal tissues
dc.subjectradiation protection
dc.subjectcomparative evaluations
dc.titleDensity comparison of 3D printing materials and the human bodypt_BR
dc.typeTexto completo de eventopt_BR
dspace.entity.typePublication
ipen.autorMARIA DA PENHA ALBUQUERQUE POTIENS
ipen.codigoautor346
ipen.contributor.ipenauthorMARIA DA PENHA ALBUQUERQUE POTIENS
ipen.date.recebimento18-02pt_BR
ipen.event.datapadronizada2017pt_BR
ipen.identifier.ipendoc24426pt_BR
ipen.notas.internasProceedingspt_BR
ipen.type.genreArtigo
relation.isAuthorOfPublication30f213ae-321d-4d51-8763-0a2585255fb9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery30f213ae-321d-4d51-8763-0a2585255fb9
sigepi.autor.atividadePOTIENS, M.P.A.:346:330:Npt_BR

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
24426b.pdf
Tamanho:
146.02 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:

Coleções