Comparative study of hierarchical clustering
Carregando...
Data
Data de publicação
2017
Orientador
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
É parte de
É parte de
É parte de
É parte de
60 YEARS OF IEA-R1: INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON UTILIZATION OF RESEARCH REACTORS
Exportar
Resumo
In archaeological studies several analytical techniques are used to study the chemical
and mineralogical composition of many materials of archaeological origin, generating
a large data set. Thus, the multivariate statistical methods become indispensable
for the interpretation of the results. These multivariate techniques, unsupervised
and supervised, are accompanied by modern computational programs, which provide
visualization and interpretation. Several methods have been used, such as cluster
analysis, discriminant analysis, principal component analysis, among others. However,
the most used is cluster analysis. The purpose of cluster analysis is to group
the samples based on similarity or dissimilarity. The groups are determined in order to
obtain homogeneity within the groups and heterogeneity between them. The literature
presents many methods for partitioning of data set, and is difficult choose which
is the most suitable, since the various combinations of methods based on different
measures of dissimilarity can lead to different patterns of grouping and false interpretations.
Nevertheless, little effort has been expended in evaluating these methods
empirically using an archaeological data set. In this way, the objective of this work
is make a comparative study of the different cluster analysis methods and to identify
which is the most appropriate. For this, the study was carried out using a data
set of the Archaeometric Studies Group from IPEN-CNEN/SP, in which 45 samples
of ceramic fragments from three archaeological sites were analyzed by instrumental
neutron activation analysis (INAA) which were determinated the mass fraction of 13
elements (As, Ce, Cr, Eu, Fe, Hf, La, Na, Nd, Sc, Sm, Th, U). The methods used
for this study were: single linkage, complete linkage, average linkage, centroid and
Ward. The comparison was done using the cophenetic correlation coefficient and
according these values the average linkage method obtained better results. A script
of the statistical program R was created to obtain the cophenetic correlation coefficient.
The purpose of this script is to facilitate the statistical study of researchers
who do not have much familiarity with statistical programs.Therefore, the researcher
can easily check which method is most appropriate for your data set.
Como referenciar
CARVALHO, P.R.; MUNITA, C.S.; LAPOLLI, A.L. Comparative study of hierarchical clustering. In: 60 YEARS OF IEA-R1: INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON UTILIZATION OF RESEARCH REACTORS, November 28 - December 01, 2017, São Paulo, SP. Abstract... São Paulo, SP: Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares, 2017. p. 52-52. Disponível em: http://repositorio.ipen.br/handle/123456789/28750. Acesso em: 30 Dec 2025.
Esta referência é gerada automaticamente de acordo com as normas do estilo IPEN/SP (ABNT NBR 6023) e recomenda-se uma verificação final e ajustes caso necessário.