Graphene oxide

dc.contributor.authorBARROS, NATALIA G. dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorGONZAGA NETO, ABEL C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVACCIOLI, KLEBER B.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorANGULO, HUGO R.V.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, LEONARDO G de A. ept_BR
dc.contributor.authorTOFFOLI, SAMUEL M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVALERA, TICIANE S.pt_BR
dc.coverageInternacional
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-29T11:56:29Z
dc.date.available2023-11-29T11:56:29Z
dc.date.issued2023pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a comparison of traditional thermal and chemical reduction methods with more recent ionizing radiation reduction via gamma rays and electron beams (e-beams). For GO, all synthesis protocols were adapted to increase production scale and are a contribution of this work. The typical Raman D-band of the GO was prominent (ID/IG ratio increased sixfold). When comparing the GO reduction techniques, dramatic differences in efficiency and GO particle characteristics were observed. Although thermal and chemical reduction are effective reduction methods, as shown through the use of FTIR spectroscopy and the C/O ratio from EDS chemical analysis, the thermal process renders great weight losses, whereas chemical processing may involve the use of hazardous chemical compounds. On the other hand, comparing the gamma rays and e-beam for 80 kGy, the Raman spectra and chemical analysis suggested that the e-beam caused a greater GO reduction: C/O ratio from EDS of 5.4 and 4.1, respectively. In addition to being fast and effective, ionizing radiation reduction processes allow easier control of the reduction degree by adjusting the radiation dose. When the dose increased from 40 to 80 kGy, the Raman spectra and EDS showed that the ID/IG and C/O ratios increased by 15 and 116%, respectively.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipIDCAPES: 0727/2020pt_BR
dc.format.extent1-17pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationBARROS, NATALIA G. de; GONZAGA NETO, ABEL C.; VACCIOLI, KLEBER B.; ANGULO, HUGO R.V.; SILVA, LEONARDO G de A. e; TOFFOLI, SAMUEL M.; VALERA, TICIANE S. Graphene oxide: a comparison of reduction methods. <b>C-Journal of Carbon Research</b>, v. 9, n. 3, p. 1-17, 2023. DOI: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/c9030073">10.3390/c9030073</a>. Disponível em: http://repositorio.ipen.br/handle/123456789/34223.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/c9030073pt_BR
dc.identifier.fasciculo3pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2311-5629
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7968-2117
dc.identifier.percentilfi61.3
dc.identifier.percentilfiCiteScore37.00
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ipen.br/handle/123456789/34223
dc.identifier.vol9pt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofC-Journal of Carbon Research
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectgraphene
dc.subjectoxides
dc.subjectchemical preparation
dc.subjectchemical reactions
dc.subjectelectron beams
dc.subjectradiations
dc.subjectreduction
dc.titleGraphene oxidept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dspace.entity.typePublication
ipen.autorLEONARDO GONDIM DE ANDRADE E SILVA
ipen.codigoautor778
ipen.contributor.ipenauthorLEONARDO GONDIM DE ANDRADE E SILVA
ipen.date.recebimento23-11
ipen.identifier.fi3.9
ipen.identifier.fiCiteScore1.6
ipen.identifier.ipendoc29853
ipen.identifier.iwosWoSpt_BR
ipen.range.fi3.000 - 4.499
ipen.range.percentilfi50.00 - 74.99
ipen.subtituloa comparison of reduction methodspt_BR
ipen.type.genreArtigo
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7dd08095-05fc-4a64-8b67-368f74cab3a7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7dd08095-05fc-4a64-8b67-368f74cab3a7
sigepi.autor.atividadeSILVA, LEONARDO G de A. e:778:220:Npt_BR

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
29853.pdf
Tamanho:
9.47 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:

Coleções